April 22, 2018
Court News Latest News | Poll Questions | Barbara Bush | Susan Collins | Stoned Pets

Comments for: Trial attorney: Ruling in case against former state prosecutor helpful for cops, lawyers in future

Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

The Bangor Daily News and the Bangor Publishing Co. encourage comments about stories, but you must follow our terms of service.

  1. Keep it civil and stay on topic
  2. No vulgarity, racial slurs, name-calling or personal attacks.
  3. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked.
The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. Here are some guidelines (see more):

  • Anonymous

    I’m sure that the constitution needs to be protected, especially when a fellow prosecutor is charged. I’m wondering if that same constitution is going to be working for those named as “john’s” that have been and will be unable to find an impartial jury? Oh, sure, a perspective juror can state that they are impartial, even after hearing and reading about the case for two months now; and that the state’s informant has, herself, pled “not guilty”. What’s fair about that? By golly though, we gotta protect a prosecutor’s constitutional rights no matter what.

  • Anonymous

    Nobody (including Cameron) denies that he betrayed the principles of his profession, even using the state-paid computer, to commit these ugly crimes.
    Nor does anyone deny that neither the state police nor the Attorney General did anything until the Feds pushed their noses in the crimes.
    Congratulations to Cameron’s lawyer for sliding him out from under some of those crimes.

You may also like