Obama defends Ambassador Rice on Benghazi handling

Posted Nov. 14, 2012, at 8:07 p.m.

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama told Republican senators on Wednesday if they had a problem with the handling of the Benghazi attack in Libya to “go after me” rather than pick on his ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice.

Obama’s comments, in a combative tone, came after two senior Republican senators said they would block any attempts by the president to put Rice into a Cabinet position that would require Senate confirmation.

Republicans have criticized Rice for going on a round of Sunday talk shows five days after the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, and saying that preliminary information suggested it was the result of protests over an anti-Muslim film rather than a premeditated strike.

The White House has repeatedly said the comments were based on the best information Rice had at the time. But Republicans have used her early assessment as a cudgel for criticizing the administration as not being forthcoming about Benghazi, and the senators’ remarks Wednesday suggested they would pursue the issue even though the U.S. presidential election is over.

“But for them to go after the U.N. ambassador who had nothing to do with Benghazi, and was simply making a presentation based on intelligence that she had received, and to besmirch her reputation is outrageous,” Obama said.

The U.S. ambassador to Libya and three other Americans were killed in the attack that has raised questions about the security of the diplomatic mission, U.S. intelligence about the threat, and the adequacy of the immediate U.S. response.

The issue has gained post-election sensitivity for the administration as Obama shapes his Cabinet for a second term. Rice is considered a possible contender to replace Secretary of State Hillary Clinton who does not intend to stay, or for another top post.

“We will do whatever’s necessary to block the nomination that’s within our power as far as Susan Rice is concerned,” said Republican Sen. John McCain, who was joined by fellow Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham.

At his first news conference since being re-elected, Obama retorted: “If Senator McCain and Senator Graham, and others want to go after somebody, they should go after me. And I’m happy to have that discussion with them.”

Obama said he had not made decisions on his second-term Cabinet yet but if he decided that Rice would be the best person to lead the State Department, “then I will nominate her.”

Asked why, if Rice had nothing to do with Benghazi she was sent on the talk shows to give the administration’s point of view, White House spokesman Tommy Vietor told Reuters: “It made sense to have Ambassador Rice, one of our most senior diplomats, speak about the critical work our diplomats do every day. Ambassador Rice was also uniquely qualified to speak about the broader unrest in the region at the time.”

The Benghazi attack

The administration’s response to Benghazi became a key issue in the last months of the presidential campaign and Obama said at the news conference that he wanted to get to the bottom of what happened.

“I think it is important for us to find out exactly what happened in Benghazi and I’m happy to cooperate in any ways that Congress wants,” he said.

“And we’ve got to get to the bottom of it and there needs to be accountability. We’ve got to bring those who carried it out to justice. They won’t get any debate from me on that,” he said.

McCain and Graham called for the creation of a Senate special committee to investigate the Benghazi attack, rather than have three separate committees with jurisdiction hold hearings: intelligence, armed services and foreign relations.

“Why did senior administration officials seek to blame the spontaneous demonstration for the attack in Benghazi when it was later acknowledged that no protests even occurred in Benghazi and that the (CIA) station chief in Tripoli was apparently reporting back in the first 24 hours that it was a terrorist attack?” McCain said.

But there appeared to be little support among Democrats who control the Senate – or even among some Republicans – for creating a special committee to investigate the Benghazi events.

House Speaker John Boehner, who like McCain is a Republican, said at this point he did not favor creating a special committee to investigate the events in Benghazi.

When asked if he would support the idea, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Democrat, bluntly said “no.”

Obama presses GOP on taxing rich to avert ‘cliff’

Obama challenged congressional Republicans on Wednesday to let taxes rise on the wealthiest Americans on both economic and political grounds, pointing out that he campaigned successfully for re-election on the point and contending it would instantly ease the threat of the “fiscal cliff” plunging the nation back into recession.

“A modest tax increase on the wealthy is not going to break their backs,” Obama said of the nation’s top income earners. “They’ll still be wealthy,” he said at his news conference.

At the same time, the president stressed he was amenable to compromise on other approaches from Republicans who say they will refuse to raise tax rates. “I believe this is solvable,” he said during the news conference.

At a news conference of his own a short while later, Boehner agreed that a bipartisan “spirit of cooperation” has been evident since the election that augurs well for talks expected to begin Friday at the White House.

However, he said of the president’s proposal, “We are not going to hurt our economy and make job creation more difficult which is exactly what that plan would do.”

Obama seemed eager to avoid issuing any ultimatums. Asked if it would be a deal-breaker for Republicans to refuse to allow the top tax rate to revert to 39.6 percent from the current 35 percent, he sidestepped. “I just want to emphasize I am open to new ideas if the Republican counterparts or some Democrats have a great idea for us to raise revenue, maintain progressivity, make sure the middle class isn’t getting hit, reduces our deficit.”

Wall Street wasn’t encouraged that agreement was becoming more likely. The Dow Jones industrial average dropped 185 points for the day.

The president’s remarks were his first extended public discussion of the issue that is dominating the postelection session of Congress, and they followed statements earlier in the week from Boehner and Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Senate GOP leader.

Both men have said they, too, want a compromise and have said they are willing to support additional tax revenues as part of a deal that includes tax reform and measures to recast the government’s largest benefit programs. But they appear to rule out any legislation that raises tax rates.

McConnell issued a statement calling on Obama to “propose a specific plan that includes meaningful entitlement reforms to strengthen and protect these programs for future generations.” He referred to Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security.

The president has moved aggressively this week to lay down markers for any negotiations, first meeting with labor leaders and representatives of liberal groups at the White House, then welcoming a delegation of corporate chief executives for a private session moments after wrapping up his news conference.

Aides said the president is prepared to go to the public in the coming days to enlist support for his position. He said Wednesday, “The American people understood what they were getting” when they voted for him after a campaign that focused heavily on taxes.

Obama is expected to welcome the top leaders of both political parties to the White House on Friday for their first postelection face-to-face discussion of the fiscal cliff, the combination of tax increases and across-the-board spending cuts that will take effect as 2012 gives way to the new year unless Congress intervenes.

Economists in both parties have cautioned that, given the sluggish state of the economy, a return to recession is likely unless lawmakers and the president reach a compromise on legislation.

At his news conference, Obama laid out bleak prospects if he and lawmakers can’t reach agreement.

“Everybody’s taxes will automatically go up, including the 98 percent of Americans who make less than $250,000 a year, and the 97 percent of small businesses who earn less than $250,000 a year. … Our economy can’t afford that right now,” he said.

As an alternative, the president suggested that Congress pass legislation immediately to “prevent any tax hike whatsoever on the first $250,000 of everybody’s income,” a measure that he noted has passed the Senate and that Democrats in the House are ready to embrace.

“We should not hold the middle class hostage while we debate tax cuts for the wealthy, and we should at least do what we agree on, and that’s keep middle class taxes low,” he said.

He said enactment of legislation along those lines would eliminate half of the fiscal cliff, and he suggested that he and lawmakers could then “shape a process whereby we look at tax reform” and “take a serious look at how we reform our entitlements, because health care costs continue to be the biggest driver of our deficits.

Obama signed legislation two years ago extending the Bush-era tax cuts in their entirety after saying he wouldn’t.

Asked why this time will be different, he said, “What I said at the time was what I meant, which is that this was a one-time proposition.”

Now, he said, legislation that keeps most of the cuts in place but not those for the upper-income earners would be “actually removing half the fiscal cliff.”

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said the president would bring to the table a proposal for $1.6 trillion in new taxes on business and the wealthy when he begins discussions with congressional Republicans, a figure that Obama outlined in his most recent budget plan. The targeted revenue is twice the amount Obama discussed with Republican leaders during debt talks during the summer of 2011.

Carney said the figure, combined with $1.1 trillion in spending cuts already signed into law, would reduce deficits by $4 trillion.

 

SEE COMMENTS →

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business
ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business

Similar Articles

More in Politics