May 25, 2018
Business Latest News | Poll Questions | Farm Bill | Memorial Day | Pigs Buried

Falmouth business leaders, developers pressure council not to block big retailers

Forecaster | BDN
Forecaster | BDN
The Falmouth Shopping Center, whose potential buyer is opposing attempts to limit the size of commercial development along U.S. Route 1, is seen here earlier this year.
By Amber Cronin, The Forecaster

FALMOUTH, Maine — The Town Council is meeting resistance from the business community on a proposed tenant footprint ordinance for the Route 1 business district.

Three heavy-hitters in the local business world — the Falmouth Cumberland Community Chamber, the Falmouth Economic Development Commission and Ben Devine, a potential buyer of the Falmouth Shopping Center — are urging the Council not to move forward with a proposed ordinance that would limit ground-floor tenant space to 50,000 sq. ft. and 2 1/2 stories.

The ordinance also puts a 60,000-square-foot limit on grocery stores, a 30,000-square-foot limit on businesses and professional office spaces, but no limits on hotel development.

In addition to limiting tenant space, the ordinance also governs how existing space, including the vacant, 52,000-square-foot former Shaw’s building at the Falmouth Shopping Center, can be redistributed to allow new tenants.

Opponents of the ordinance say it was hastily developed and that the council should delay a vote scheduled for Monday, Oct. 22, in favor of more discussion with businesses.

The Falmouth Cumberland Community Chamber in a letter to the council requested the proposed ordinance and “use the additional time to find a better balance between a new vision for Route 1 and the real world impacts of stricter zoning on existing and future investment in Falmouth.”

Devine agreed. He said while he understands the need for land use regulations, he feels this particular ordinance was developed too quickly and without enough input from businesses.

“I don’t know if the Town Council is going to have a vote on the ordinance, but I don’t think it has been properly vetted,” he said. “There isn’t going to be any opportunity for public dialogue. I do hope that when they put this ordinance up for a vote that there is an opportunity to speak, not just for folks who question the size of the cap.”

On Friday, Oct. 12, at a meeting with the Falmouth Cumberland Community Chamber, Councilor Bonny Rodden, chairwoman of the council’s Community Development Committee, said the ordinance has been in the works for almost a decade.

“We held a charette in 2009 with the owners of the shopping center and the business community and residents and everyone was given a number of options,” she said. “We’ve had surveys, a number of council meetings and committee meetings and it’s finally coming to a head. Whenever something comes to a head there’s friction, but we feel it’s time.”

Jonathan Berry, president of the Falmouth Economic Development Commission — a private, non-governmental body that advocates for businesses — said the time has come for something to be done after years of study, but that this amendment does not balance the interests of business in Falmouth.

“The business community is waiting to see a new, vibrant Route 1,” he said. “The vacancies aren’t good for anyone.”

The tenant footprint limit is being billed as a balance of interest, but business interests are not being taken into account, Berry said.

Councilor Tony Payne, a member of the Community Development Committee, agreed with Berry. He said the council is not listening to the business community.

The council has “not shown any interest at this point in listening to what the business community says and I am confounded,” Payne said.

Have feedback? Want to know more? Send us ideas for follow-up stories.

You may also like