June 21, 2018
Nation Latest News | Poll Questions | Family Separations | Boston TV | LePage Troops

2 forensic experts say it’s not George Zimmerman crying out for help in 911 call

By Jeff Weiner, The Orlando Sentinel

ORLANDO, Fla. — As the Trayvon Martin controversy splinters into a debate about self-defense, a central question remains: Who was heard crying for help on a 911 call in the moments before the teenager was shot?

An expert in the field of forensic voice identification sought to answer that question by analyzing the recordings for the Orlando Sentinel.

His result: It was not George Zimmerman who called for help.

Tom Owen, forensic consultant for Owen Forensic Services LLC and chairman emeritus of the American Board of Recorded Evidence, used voice-identification software to rule out Zimmerman. Another expert contacted by the Sentinel, using different techniques, came to the same conclusion.

Zimmerman claims self-defense in the shooting and told police that he was the one screaming for help. The two experts say the evidence tells a different story.

On a rainy night in late February, a woman called 911 to report someone crying out for help in her gated Sanford community, Retreat at Twin Lakes.

Though several of her neighbors eventually called authorities, she phoned early enough for dispatchers to hear the panicked cries and the gunshot that took Trayvon Martin’s life.

Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer, shot Martin, an unarmed 17-year-old, on Feb. 26.

Before the shot, one of them can be heard screaming for help.

Owen, a court-qualified expert witness and former chief engineer for the New York Public Library’s Rodgers and Hammerstein Archives of Recorded Sound, is an authority on biometric voice analysis — a computerized process comparing attributes of voices to determine whether they match.

After the Sentinel contacted Owen, he used software called Easy Voice Biometrics to compare Zimmerman’s voice to the 911 call screams.

“I took all of the screams and put those together, and cut out everything else,” Owen said.

The software compared that audio to Zimmerman’s voice. It returned a 48 percent match. Owen said to reach a positive match with audio of this quality, he’d expect higher than 90 percent.

“As a result of that, you can say with reasonable scientific certainty that it’s not Zimmerman,” Owen said, stressing that he could not confirm the voice as Martin’s because he didn’t have a sample of the teenager’s voice to compare.

Forensic voice identification is not a new or novel concept. A recent U.S. Justice Department report notes that federal interest in the technology “has a history of nearly 70 years.”

Voice identification is “the main biometric tool” used to track international criminals and terrorists, Owen said. “These people don’t leave fingerprints, but they do still need to talk to one another.”

Much as the ridges of a human hand produce a fingerprint, each human voice has unique, distinguishable traits, Owen said. “They’re all particular to the individual.”

Another benefit of modern biometric analysis, Owen said, is it doesn’t require an “in context” comparison. In other words, Owen didn’t need a sample of Zimmerman screaming in order to compare his voice to the call.

Not all experts rely on biometrics. Ed Primeau, a Michigan-based audio engineer and forensics expert, does not support the technology’s use in courtrooms.

He relies instead on audio enhancement and human analysis based on forensic experience. After listening closely to the 911 tape on which the screams are heard, Primeau also has a strong opinion.

“I believe that’s Trayvon Martin in the background, without a doubt,” Primeau saids, stressing that the tone of the voice is a giveaway. “That’s a young man screaming.”

Zimmerman’s call to authorities minutes before the shooting provides a good standard for comparison, Primeau says, because it captures his voice both at rest and in an agitated state.

Only one person alive knows exactly what transpired in the moments immediately before Martin was fatally shot: Zimmerman, who has claimed he fired in self-defense.

Zimmerman told police he was walking back to his sport-utility vehicle after a brief foot pursuit of Martin, and the teenager confronted and attacked him, punching him and slamming his head into the pavement.

Arriving police said Zimmerman was bloodied. One officer wrote in a police report that he overheard Zimmerman telling a paramedic, “I was yelling for someone to help me, but no one would help me.”

Angela Corey, the special prosecutor assigned to the case, has yet to decide whether to charge Zimmerman, send the case to a grand jury or decide against charging him.

If Zimmerman’s self-defense claim is tested at trial, legal experts say a forensic identification of the voice in the 911 audio could be key evidence, either in Zimmerman’s favor or to his detriment.

Still, Maine-based audio enhancement expert Arlo West says that today’s juries sometimes seem reluctant to accept evidence that’s any less conclusive than what they’re used to seeing on television.

“I call it the ‘CSI’ effect,” he says, referring to “CSI: Crime Scene Investigation,” the popular — if not always realistic — forensics-based TV drama. “You get in front of a jury, and they expect a miracle.”

©2012 The Orlando Sentinel (Orlando, Fla.)

Have feedback? Want to know more? Send us ideas for follow-up stories.

You may also like