BIW lands two more ship contracts

The Murphy, which was built in a series of Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, is christened at Bath Iron Works shipyard in Bath on May 7, 2011.
Pat Wellenbach | AP
The Murphy, which was built in a series of Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, is christened at Bath Iron Works shipyard in Bath on May 7, 2011.
Posted Sept. 26, 2011, at 6:51 p.m.
Last modified Sept. 27, 2011, at 11:25 a.m.
Print this   E-mail this    Facebook this   Tweet this     

BATH, Maine – Bath Iron Works landed two more contracts for Arleigh Burke-class warships Monday which will add to an already robust amount of Navy construction enjoyed by the shipyard.

Members of Maine’s congressional delegation said Navy Secretary Ray Mabus announced the contracts late Monday afternoon. BIW spokesman James DeMartini said the announcement took shipyard officials by surprise at about 5:15 p.m.

“We were expecting an announcement by the end of the month but today we weren’t quite ready,” said DeMartini late Monday evening. “My first priority is always to tell the employees then everyone else comes next.”

The decision affirms recent speculation that more Arleigh Burke contracts were on the verge of being announced. The restarted Burke line is in lieu of the more expensive DDG-1000 Zumwalt-class destroyers. The Zumwalts will be discontinued after three ships, which are also being built in Bath.

Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee and the Senate Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, said she fought on behalf of BIW last year by opposing a continuing resolution, which is a temporary measure meant to continue funding the government until Congress can agree on a permanent budget.

“These ships were in jeopardy if the Navy would have been forced to operate under a long-term continuing resolution,” said Collins in a release. “Today’s contract award of the DDG-115 is evidence of the fact that the Congress recognized the importance of funding these ships.”

That the ships were awarded to BIW said something about the Maine shipyard’s importance to the Navy, said Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine.

“For 127 years, Bath Iron Works has stood out as an irreplaceable national resource and the Navy’s purchase of these Bath-built Arleigh Burke Destroyers in addition to their recent purchase of the DDG-1001 and DDG-1002 ships affirms that fact,” said Snowe in a press release.

On Sept. 15, the Navy awarded contracts worth up to a combined $2 billion for the second and third ships in the Zumwalt line, which will be delivered over the next several years. The contracts awarded to BIW on Monday were for a DDG-115 for $680 million and an option for a DDG-116 at a value of $665 million. The option means that the second ship is contingent on Congress appropriating the money in its 2012 budget.

U.S. Reps. Mike Michaud and Chellie Pingree, both D-Maine, said in a joint statement Monday that BIW’s low bid for the ships helped it prevail over Huntington Ingalls Industries of Pascagoula, Miss., which is the only other shipyard that builds the Arleigh Burkes. Ingalls on Monday was awarded a contract for a DDG-114 at a value of $698 million. Both shipyards have other DDG-51s under construction.

“This will help ensure a steady flow of work at the shipyard,” said Pingree. “Once the DDG-1000s are finished at Bath Iron Works, the DDG-51 is going to be the yard’s bread and butter for years ahead.”

Michaud agreed.

“This is another important step ahead for Bath and the entire region’s economy,” said Michaud.

DeMartini said the Arleigh Burkes and Zumwalts will be built side by side at the shipyard.

“We can see stability in our workload for the near future,” he said. “This is a very welcome addition to our backlog.”

CORRECTION:

An earlier version of this story implied that the decision to discontinue the Zumwalt series was made recently. That decision was made in 2009.

Similar articles:

Marketplace News

Marketplace

Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

The Bangor Daily News encourages comments about stories, but you must follow our terms of service.

In brief:

  1. Keep it civil and stay on topic
  2. No vulgarity, racial slurs, name-calling or personal attacks.
  3. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. Here are some guidelines (see more):

  • Anonymous

    Why is it that people are willing to freak out over social spending, but seem to have no problem with us shelling out $700 million bucks to build an unneeded warship.  Our Navy is already more than we can afford, why are we still adding to it?

  • Anonymous

    I’d be interested in learning what your source is for claiming these Navy ships are “unneeded.”  I understood, from our military leaders, that the US Navy is actually well below the number of ships needed, and countries such as China, continue to grow their fleets.

  • PaulNotBunyan

    Yeah, we can sell all our coastal states to China and we won’t need the Navy or the Coast Guard. Then we need to figure out a way to get rid of the Army and Air Force.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_7T3YNF6MG3FPEAVTFIJC44VQUI Dlbrt

    China will buy them to keep their new country’s (US) citezens in line!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_7T3YNF6MG3FPEAVTFIJC44VQUI Dlbrt

    Most normal people aren’t that way, it is the outer right fringes that  exhibit that bizzare behaviour!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_7T3YNF6MG3FPEAVTFIJC44VQUI Dlbrt

       After giving your question considerably more thought I came to the conclusion that there IS a common denominator, it’s called the profit motive, or capitalism.
     
       With every government agency that has a direct relationship with the American People, such as S.S., Medicare, the Post Office, FEMA, public schools; ECT the conservative fringe seems to object. Currently they not only object but they have devised plans to replace this relationship with a business designed to skim a profit or gain power from that relationship.
     
    Examples; S. S. /replaced by private investment accounts, Medicare /vouchers for Insurance companies, Public Schools/ Charter school vouchers,FEMA / private insurance and disaster response companies.
    (Google Jeb Bush’s Disaster Relief Company)
     
    And the WISH list goes on!
     
       When there is a middle man (Corporation) who is making a profit from the government such as BIW who is a private company  building the ships For the Government at the Taxpayers expense that is ok. Besides Corporations need a strong Military to protect their global interests. What better than the US fleet? 
     
    The US has over 700 bases in foreign countries!
     
     How many Corporations?
     
        If a reasonable person looks at the recurrent right wing theme that Government isn’t the answer, Government is the problem, along with these attacks on government agencies that have a direct relationship with the masses, he may conclude that they not only believe this but they have devised a plan to remove the government with the intent to replace it with private ownership

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business

Marketplace Coupons

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business