CONTRIBUTORS

Sustainable forestry works for Maine paper industry

Posted Aug. 29, 2011, at 4:42 p.m.
Print this   E-mail this    Facebook this   Tweet this     

As the U.S. economy continues to struggle with high unemployment rates, now more than ever Maine needs manufacturing and, in turn, manufacturing needs Maine.

Maine’s pulp and paper sector provides 7,500 jobs and accounts for approximately 15 percent of all manufacturing jobs in the state, and Sappi Fine Paper North America’s Somerset Mill and its 840 employees are an important part of that sector. For manufacturing companies such as ours to have a viable future, we need to invest in our assets and implement reasonable and achievable environmental reforms.

Sappi works to protect our natural resources, not just because it is the right thing to do but because it is fundamental to the future of our planet and our business. Our commitment starts at the beginning of our supply chain with raw materials — all of the wood that we procure to make our pulp and paper comes from sustainably managed forests.

Since 2008, our Somerset Mill in Skowhegan has been certified by the three most recognized sustainable forestry certification programs: the Forest Stewardship Council, the Sustainable Forestry Initiative and the Programme for the Endorsement of Certification.

Additionally, the energy that we use to power many of our manufacturing operations also comes from renewable resources. With more than 85 percent renewable energy, Sappi has the lowest carbon footprint in the industry, surpassing an industry average of 66 percent. Between 2007 and 2010, we were able to reduce our emissions by 40 percent, thereby significantly outpacing legislative targets concerning climate change.

Recently, our Somerset Mill became certified as a Green-e Energy organization with the Center for Resource Solutions. The Green-e certification attests that 100 percent of the electricity used to manufacture select products at the mill is made with certified renewable energy that we generate on site. This certification was made possible by a $49 million capital project we completed last year to upgrade the Somerset Mill’s recovery cycle equipment. The project enabled us to use more “black” liquor that is produced from our pulping operation and further reduce our fossil fuel usage.

We also strive to reduce our impact on the environment through attention to the transportation that we use to deliver our products. For more than two years, Sappi has been a certified EPA SmartWaySM Transport Partner, utilizing freight delivery services that are designed to increase energy efficiency while significantly reducing greenhouse gases and air pollution.

Improving our energy efficiency and reducing our fossil fuel usage not only lowers our greenhouse gas emissions and benefits the environment, but it also helps reduce our costs — a benefit that is critical to any business in today’s economy.

We are proud that despite challenging economic conditions, we continue to invest in our infrastructure in order to bring greater environmental and economic benefits to our business. We support legislation that calls for environmental protection and sets realistic goals for companies to achieve them.

We commend Sens. Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe and Rep. Mike Michaud for their support of manufacturing interests in Maine. At the same time, we are concerned that despite their efforts, certain regulatory efforts such as the EPA’s proposed Boiler MACT and Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials rules could result in job losses and divert important capital from other improvement projects for the paper industry in Maine and elsewhere.

The exceptionally high costs for compliance standards outlined by the proposed regulations could create conditions where using renewable biomass fuels would become so expensive that Sappi and other companies would have to revert to using more fossil fuels, which goes directly against the goals of improving the environment and operating sustainably.

We understand that operating sustainably and protecting our environment is a responsibility in which everyone — individuals and companies alike — must do their part. Sappi Fine Paper North America has a rich history of providing jobs in Maine dating back to 1854, and we look forward to many years to come. Yet, our ability to remain globally competitive and provide good paying jobs for our employees is contingent on regulations that balance both costs and benefits while keeping U.S. manufacturing globally competitive.

We need to continue making investments in our assets, which can bring environmental and economic returns to Sappi, Maine, and the communities where we live and work.

Mark Gardner is president and CEO of Sappi Fine Paper North America. He joined Sappi in 1981, and his experience includes serving as the vice president of manufacturing and vice president of supply chain. He also has worked at the Westbrook and Somerset mills.

Similar articles:

Marketplace News

Marketplace

Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

The Bangor Daily News encourages comments about stories, but you must follow our terms of service.

In brief:

  1. Keep it civil and stay on topic
  2. No vulgarity, racial slurs, name-calling or personal attacks.
  3. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. Here are some guidelines (see more):

  • Anonymous

    “now more than ever Maine needs manufacturing and, in turn, manufacturing needs Maine”
    That applies to LePage, Snowe & Collins, but not Michaud….!

    Michaud has had years to promote, develop and help manufacturing, but instead has earned the name Media-Mike.

    .

  • Anonymous

    “now more than ever Maine needs manufacturing and, in turn, manufacturing needs Maine”
    That applies to LePage, Snowe & Collins, but not Michaud….!

    Michaud has had years to promote, develop and help manufacturing, but instead has earned the name Media-Mike.

    .

  • Anonymous

    “now more than ever Maine needs manufacturing and, in turn, manufacturing needs Maine”
    That applies to LePage, Snowe & Collins, but not Michaud….!

    Michaud has had years to promote, develop and help manufacturing, but instead has earned the name Media-Mike.

    .

  • Anonymous

    “now more than ever Maine needs manufacturing and, in turn, manufacturing needs Maine”
    That applies to LePage, Snowe & Collins, but not Michaud….!

    Michaud has had years to promote, develop and help manufacturing, but instead has earned the name Media-Mike.

    .

  • Anonymous

    Sounds like an ad for Sappi Fine  Paper North America.

  • yowsayowsa1

     It’s odd that Mike Michaud is showing support publicly for manufacturing and particularly wood manufacturing jobs in the state, but has yet to publicly show support for the very basis of these jobs; the timber growing industry.

     Mike
     We want to know how you feel about the National Park Service’s plan to take out of production at least 3.2 million acres (or more) of our timber producing landbase.
     Senators Snowe and Collins have had no trouble in repelling the attack on rural Maine by telling Sec. Salazar to stay away and keep his  landowner abuseing NPS out of our backyard.
     It’s time to get off the fence and give us a glimpse of what you were sent to Washington to do; 
     REPRESENT US.

     NO PARK FOR ME.

  • yowsayowsa1

     It’s odd that Mike Michaud is showing support publicly for manufacturing and particularly wood manufacturing jobs in the state, but has yet to publicly show support for the very basis of these jobs; the timber growing industry.

     Mike
     We want to know how you feel about the National Park Service’s plan to take out of production at least 3.2 million acres (or more) of our timber producing landbase.
     Senators Snowe and Collins have had no trouble in repelling the attack on rural Maine by telling Sec. Salazar to stay away and keep his  landowner abuseing NPS out of our backyard.
     It’s time to get off the fence and give us a glimpse of what you were sent to Washington to do; 
     REPRESENT US.

     NO PARK FOR ME.

  • yowsayowsa1

     It’s odd that Mike Michaud is showing support publicly for manufacturing and particularly wood manufacturing jobs in the state, but has yet to publicly show support for the very basis of these jobs; the timber growing industry.

     Mike
     We want to know how you feel about the National Park Service’s plan to take out of production at least 3.2 million acres (or more) of our timber producing landbase.
     Senators Snowe and Collins have had no trouble in repelling the attack on rural Maine by telling Sec. Salazar to stay away and keep his  landowner abuseing NPS out of our backyard.
     It’s time to get off the fence and give us a glimpse of what you were sent to Washington to do; 
     REPRESENT US.

     NO PARK FOR ME.

  • yowsayowsa1

     It’s odd that Mike Michaud is showing support publicly for manufacturing and particularly wood manufacturing jobs in the state, but has yet to publicly show support for the very basis of these jobs; the timber growing industry.

     Mike
     We want to know how you feel about the National Park Service’s plan to take out of production at least 3.2 million acres (or more) of our timber producing landbase.
     Senators Snowe and Collins have had no trouble in repelling the attack on rural Maine by telling Sec. Salazar to stay away and keep his  landowner abuseing NPS out of our backyard.
     It’s time to get off the fence and give us a glimpse of what you were sent to Washington to do; 
     REPRESENT US.

     NO PARK FOR ME.

  • yowsayowsa1

     It’s odd that Mike Michaud is showing support publicly for manufacturing and particularly wood manufacturing jobs in the state, but has yet to publicly show support for the very basis of these jobs; the timber growing industry.

     Mike
     We want to know how you feel about the National Park Service’s plan to take out of production at least 3.2 million acres (or more) of our timber producing landbase.
     Senators Snowe and Collins have had no trouble in repelling the attack on rural Maine by telling Sec. Salazar to stay away and keep his  landowner abuseing NPS out of our backyard.
     It’s time to get off the fence and give us a glimpse of what you were sent to Washington to do; 
     REPRESENT US.

     NO PARK FOR ME.

  • Anonymous

    Sustainability has become a buzz-word that flies around from one side of the political aisle to the other faster than a bee in a clover patch.

    The need for reasoned and conscientious approaches to land management and resource preservation is undeniable. The long history of manufacturing in Maine has taught us that. So is the need for jobs and an economy that can provide for the well-being of our citizens.

    Yet the essential irrefutable conflict between business interests (like Mr. Gardner’s) and the public interest, while easily masked by buzz-words, remains once the speeches are over.

    It is the primary obligation of businesses to make profits for their shareholders, not to be foresighted on behalf of the general citizenry. It is a primary obligation of governments to exercise prudent restraint on overly enthusiastic quests by businesses to make those profits. That is a part of what our Constitution calls for: to …”promote our common welfare.”

    It is also true that many businesses are learning ways to improve their bottom line while practicing responsible stewardship for the environment; however, trusting that boardroom decisions will be made with those concerns placed ahead of or on a par with profit-making is more than naive. It’s a blatant falsehood. Corporations have no greater responsibility than to secure profits while staying within the letter of the law. That’s why they spend vast sums of money each year trying to remake or obliterate laws which have a negative impact on their revenues an increase their expenses.

    The only successful marriage is one between equals. While business (in this case) may be the money maker, a responsible government must be in charge of the savings accounts. 

  • Anonymous

    Sustainability has become a buzz-word that flies around from one side of the political aisle to the other faster than a bee in a clover patch.

    The need for reasoned and conscientious approaches to land management and resource preservation is undeniable. The long history of manufacturing in Maine has taught us that. So is the need for jobs and an economy that can provide for the well-being of our citizens.

    Yet the essential irrefutable conflict between business interests (like Mr. Gardner’s) and the public interest, while easily masked by buzz-words, remains once the speeches are over.

    It is the primary obligation of businesses to make profits for their shareholders, not to be foresighted on behalf of the general citizenry. It is a primary obligation of governments to exercise prudent restraint on overly enthusiastic quests by businesses to make those profits. That is a part of what our Constitution calls for: to …”promote our common welfare.”

    It is also true that many businesses are learning ways to improve their bottom line while practicing responsible stewardship for the environment; however, trusting that boardroom decisions will be made with those concerns placed ahead of or on a par with profit-making is more than naive. It’s a blatant falsehood. Corporations have no greater responsibility than to secure profits while staying within the letter of the law. That’s why they spend vast sums of money each year trying to remake or obliterate laws which have a negative impact on their revenues an increase their expenses.

    The only successful marriage is one between equals. While business (in this case) may be the money maker, a responsible government must be in charge of the savings accounts. 

  • Anonymous

    Sustainability has become a buzz-word that flies around from one side of the political aisle to the other faster than a bee in a clover patch.

    The need for reasoned and conscientious approaches to land management and resource preservation is undeniable. The long history of manufacturing in Maine has taught us that. So is the need for jobs and an economy that can provide for the well-being of our citizens.

    Yet the essential irrefutable conflict between business interests (like Mr. Gardner’s) and the public interest, while easily masked by buzz-words, remains once the speeches are over.

    It is the primary obligation of businesses to make profits for their shareholders, not to be foresighted on behalf of the general citizenry. It is a primary obligation of governments to exercise prudent restraint on overly enthusiastic quests by businesses to make those profits. That is a part of what our Constitution calls for: to …”promote our common welfare.”

    It is also true that many businesses are learning ways to improve their bottom line while practicing responsible stewardship for the environment; however, trusting that boardroom decisions will be made with those concerns placed ahead of or on a par with profit-making is more than naive. It’s a blatant falsehood. Corporations have no greater responsibility than to secure profits while staying within the letter of the law. That’s why they spend vast sums of money each year trying to remake or obliterate laws which have a negative impact on their revenues an increase their expenses.

    The only successful marriage is one between equals. While business (in this case) may be the money maker, a responsible government must be in charge of the savings accounts. 

  • Anonymous

    Don’t hold your breath, Michaud sold us out years ago

  • Anonymous

    Sustainable forestry works for Maine paper industry ??
    We will have more and more forested land as soon as all the chip board, paper mills, power plants close.
    the mills will become a show place for history  taken over for the parks devision to show how life was

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business

Marketplace Coupons

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business