MATTHEW GAGNON

Building a budget from zero finds the waste

Posted Aug. 25, 2011, at 3:30 p.m.
Print this   E-mail this    Facebook this   Tweet this     

Lost in all the kerfuffle over congressional redistricting has been a rather interesting tidbit of news. Gov. Paul LePage has asked his cabinet to institute a new (for Maine) way of drawing up state budget numbers, something called “zero-base budgeting.”

There probably isn’t a drier topic on earth than the budget process, but for Maine, there probably isn’t anything more critical to the healthy functioning of the state than how the budget is drawn up.

Zero-base budgeting has been a desired policy by many in Maine for a long time, and there is a good reason why. Put simply, it directs department heads to use a cost-benefit analysis when looking at department programs and expenditures. For every budget.

Voters of all parties have long felt that Maine spends money inefficiently, and wastes a lot on things that don’t really help. In a poor state, this means that taxes have to be higher than they should be in order to support that inefficiency. This, in turn makes it more difficult for people to get by, puts less money in the state economy and makes it harder to start and grow a business.

This new way of doing things will hopefully begin to address that.

State agencies will now be required to prioritize and justify all the programs, activities and expenditures that they are responsible for, starting from — you guessed it — zero. In other words, every time a budget is drawn up they essentially start from scratch and build from the ground up.

During the review process, no reference is made to the previous level of expenditure, and the resulting budget will be much more realistic and efficient.

Currently, Maine uses what is known as “incremental budgeting,” which only asks departments to justify new additions or deletions to their budgets. As such, the only thing that matters year to year is the variance between the last budget — the baseline — and the new one.

The new budget process is a child of the private sector, where ZBB, as it is known, is used to more efficiently allocate resources, find bloated budgets and obsolete operations and force managers to look for more cost effective ways of operating.

It is no surprise that LePage, himself a businessman and one who operated his business on a shoestring budget, would be interested in trying something like this in state government.

The reason that the implementation of zero-base budgeting is such a welcome idea is because it essentially rejects any assumptions that the things that were funded in previous budgets deserve to be funded again.

Under normal budgeting, governments often fall into lazy traps whereby they assume previously funded programs deserve to continue, simply because the problems they were intended to address persist. Bureaucrats assume need without looking deeply at what the money is spent on and if the benefit of that spending is really worth it. This, of course, leads to waste.

Under the new system, Maine will actually be forced to look at the money it spends, what it spends it on and whether or not what it is spending money on is actually worth it. Several commissioners have already suggested that this move will force significant restructuring and savings.

Believe it or not, it was none other than Democrat Jimmy Carter, while he was serving as Georgia’s governor and later as president, who was the first major proponent of zero-base budgeting in government.

While Republicans like this idea more than Democrats, there is no doubt it has appeal across parties. After all, who can really argue with looking more closely at what we spend money on and evaluating things based on effectiveness?

In an age of shrinking economies, budget cuts and austerity, simple but important steps like this can go a long way toward building the best state possible in extraordinarily difficult times.

Matthew Gagnon, a Hampden native, is a Republican political strategist. He previously worked for Sen. Susan Collins and the National Republican Senatorial Committee. You can reach him at matthew.o.gagnon@gmail.com and read his blog at www.pinetreepolitics.com.

Similar articles:

Marketplace News

Marketplace

Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

The Bangor Daily News encourages comments about stories, but you must follow our terms of service.

In brief:

  1. Keep it civil and stay on topic
  2. No vulgarity, racial slurs, name-calling or personal attacks.
  3. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. Here are some guidelines (see more):

  • Anonymous

    He is still an a**

  • Anonymous

    He is still an a**

  • Anonymous

    He is still an a**

  • Anonymous

    just move to california

  • Anonymous

    No problem with taking a closer look at budget items, but there are 2 big problems with this plan.
    First in Maine it will put entire departments to work 5 days a week at justifying their existence. Unless there are numbers of people hired in each department to accomplish this goal the people who we pay our tax dollars to do a job will be away from that job crunching numbers all year long. For some very small departments it will be simple, but the largest of the state departments will have a hell of a time going line for line item for item and job for job doing a thorough justification.
    Second, LePage is the problem, he’s shown in his first half year that he rules with his emotions, and spur of the moment. Once he starts tossing departments around based on who he happens to favor at the time we’ll see the entire state in a congress like stall.

    LePage is qualified to be a retail manager, not governor of this or any other state. You can’t run a state like a business, it’s not about disciplining cashiers, handing out 10 cent an hour raises and buying train loads of cheap blue tarps.  We don’t work for him, he works for us,  He should answer to us not to his special interest groups and out of state businesses, until he gets that into his head Maine will stay on a fast track to nowhere.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/John-Day/100000234116470 John Day

    This is the liberal reply to a well-researched political analysis? Two columns in, this guy is a massive improvement over Pat LeMarche.  Good move, BDN.

  • Anonymous

    One man’s waste is another man’s toe hold on survival.

  • Anonymous

    In the business management consulting world there is always a new or “newly reinvented” way of doing things that will save the day!  ZBB is nothing new. 

    The problem here is that it is assumed, but certainly proven that the budget process has been lazy and did not include annual or periodic reviews.  The Governor and the writer assume this and we all know what happens when you assume something.

    They will also find that due to funding restrictions from the Federal and State level it’s probably a little more complicated then they think.  Using a fad approach always sounds great, but doing is usually a lot harder.  Good luck!

  • Anonymous

    Great editorial Mr. Gagnon.  ZBB is hated by leftists because it doesn’t assume growth in spending.  It is this growth that grows their flock of  entitlement addicted electorate. 

    I’m convinced that we will now see some perspective from the right, and not all from the left as in the past.  At least the BDN did something right.

  • PabMainer

    Agree that this process is not new but certainly new to our state government…..for too long gov agencies have been starting their budget process with the amount of monies that were allocated the previous year….then a simple look at the last year’s expenditures and often this first look gives the impression that their respective budget needs an increase or decrease based on the previous year’s operating costs…..I see this as an opportunity to look at all costs associated with particular budgets and looking at cutting unnecessary and /or duplicated efforts…..maybe combining some efforts or purchasing to get better results…..maybe some consolidation in areas to cut certain spendings…..IMHO the wrong assumption for any gov agency is to have the mind-set that we spent this much last budget so we need this same amount or possibley even more budgeted to operate this year…..accountability to those funding the budgets…..

  • Anonymous

    You can’t run a state like a business.  How about the signing up of a company to run your lottery based on a plane ride to Atlanta.  Or, the signing of a contract with a company with zero track record and throw out the old computer system even before it is proven that the “new” software even works for DHHS. The money “wasted” on this fiasco could have helped more needy families.  The purchase of new financial aid software that doesn’t work correctly, leaving many needy students in the lurch.  At this point it would seem that someone with a little “business sense” may be better for the the state than the close to forty years of maladministration by the Democrats. Let’s start a movement to have Susan Cook appointed as spokesperson for the Democratic Party, after all we all need a good laugh now and again.

  • Anonymous

    No one is qualified to be Governor-LePage was elected. He has only been in there for seven months-give him a chance. Too many are crying and afraid but at least, hopefully, we have seen the last-for a while- of the silliness of people like Baldy and Martin, our own comedy team.

  • Anonymous

    Excellent editorial, well written, succint and clear. The government on the other hand is the exact opposite. That Lepage has exposed this is the reason there is so much belly aching going on these posts about the changes he proposes. Unfortunately, some lemming will replace him and change everything back to the way it was which will cause all sorts of backfiring and belching and then the liberals will blame Lepage for the next 40 years for the disaster. it is happening in DC now and they have only gone back to the Reagan era.  Addicts respond the same way when they are jonesin’.

  • Anonymous

    Excellent editorial, well written, succint and clear. The government on the other hand is the exact opposite. That Lepage has exposed this is the reason there is so much belly aching going on these posts about the changes he proposes. Unfortunately, some lemming will replace him and change everything back to the way it was which will cause all sorts of backfiring and belching and then the liberals will blame Lepage for the next 40 years for the disaster. it is happening in DC now and they have only gone back to the Reagan era.  Addicts respond the same way when they are jonesin’.

  • Anonymous

    I think you are lumping a lot of things together here.  I did not vote for LePage and don’t trust most of what comes out of his mouth most of the time.  But as someone who did budgets in the private sector, ZBB makes sense to try.  It really forces you to analyse and evaluate how effective your programs and the associated dollars spent are.  It also encourages thinking in creative ways to get more bang for the buck.  Things change and ZBB encourages businesses (and possibly govt.) to react to current reality versus historical assumptions.  Yes, it will be hard initially but not trying new things is stupid in business or government.  Change is not always bad.

    This, as pointed out, is not necessarily a partisan issue, unless we make it one.  Which these days seems to be par for the course.  From BOTH parties and their supporters.

  • Anonymous

    That stuff happens in the private sector too you know.  I lived it for 20 years.  millions on systems that weren’t “perfect” or on consultants whose ideas were never implemented…or implemented for a while until the next latest and greatest came along.  My favorite was Total Quality Management which both the State of Maine and private businesses embraced with gusto.  A lot of meetings, slogans, forms, excercises and hand holding with each other which all boiled down to “do the right thing right the first time”…a pretty simple concept.  And something I still think about.

  • Anonymous

    Exactly..more information never hurts.  I just wish the Governor would realize that is true for a lot of things.

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business

Marketplace Coupons

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business