CONTRIBUTORS

Founding Fathers and federal debt

Posted Aug. 17, 2011, at 5:56 p.m.

With Congress and the White House stalemated over the question of debt, it may be reassuring, even instructive, to consider that our nation was embroiled in a crisis over public debt at the very dawn of its history.

In fact, the primary motive that brought delegates to the Constitutional Convention of 1787 was to sort out vexing questions of debt and taxes.

The debt in question was that owed by the American rebels to the governments of France and Holland, two key allies that had provided funds to support Washington’s army. Those loans were necessary because the currency issued by the Continental Congress in the early stages of the war had been exhausted, first through unrestrained spending and finally through inflation and loss of confidence. Funds also were owed to American businessmen who had purchased domestic bonds in an effort to prop up a faltering Congress.

The funding situation of the nascent American government slipped into genuine crisis in 1780, prompting Congress to appoint Robert Morris, a celebrated Philadelphia capitalist, to the new position of superintendent of finance.

The first object of the program Morris put into place was to acquire for the government what Morris termed “the inestimable jewel of public credit.”

This was a relatively new conception, the idea that public debt, supported by public confidence, or credit, could actually be a boon to the people at large.

With debt financing, Morris advised, the government could undertake and achieve large projects: fielding an army, for example, or after the peace, building roads and “internal navigations.”

This had been demonstrated in the early stages of the war, when Congress financed the army by printing money, but public confidence in the new American currency had been squandered.

That confidence could be restored simply enough, Morris said, by the payment of taxes. That strategy may seem prosaic enough, but consider the tone Morris adopted in pressing the governors of the states to fund the operations of the Congress.

“It is by being just to Individuals, to each other, to the Union,” Morris insisted, “by generous grants of solid Revenue, and by adopting energetic measures to collect that Revenue; and not by complainings, vauntings, or recriminations that these states must expect to establish their Independence.”

Preaching the gospel of taxation at a time when many Americans were fighting against the tax authority of Parliament was a doomed enterprise, however, and Morris failed to obtain either sufficient revenues from the states nor taxing authority for the central government, which was then little more than a debating forum for what were sovereign states. Fortunately for the American patriots, the blunders of the British high command brought the war to a close, and the funding questions were set aside.

But not for long. A postwar recession and the deepening political malaise of the newly free colonists brought matters to a head, and in 1787 Morris joined with a coterie of nationalist-minded colleagues — George Washington, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and the rest — to establish a central government with taxing authority that would finally fund the lingering debts from the war. In the process, they replaced the 13 colonial currencies with a single, national medium of exchange, established a central bank and inaugurated a freewheeling market for government securities that set the stage for a decade of robust economic growth.

There were other critical elements to the Constitution, of course, regarding the shape and scope of the government and its powers, but debt and funding were at the top of the agenda in Philadelphia.

Lest there be any doubt as to the centrality of debt in Morris’ thinking, he spelled it out in a public address upon leaving office in 1784. “The payment of debts may well be expensive, but it is infinitely more expensive to withhold the payment,” Morris warned. “The former is an expense of money, when money may be commanded to defray it; but the latter involves the destruction of that source from whence money can be derived when all other sources fail. That source, abundant, nay almost inexhaustible, is public credit.”

At a time when congressional bickering and posturing has cost the United States its prime bond rating, and when markets around the globe are looking to Washington for leadership, the solons of the House and Senate might best look to the past for the sort of conviction and sound reasoning that first set America on the path of unprecedented economic success.

Charles Rappleye is the author of “Robert Morris: Financier of the American Revolution.” He wrote this for the Los Angeles Times.

SEE COMMENTS →

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business
ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business

Similar Articles

More in Opinion