Grant allows UMaine to turn up heat on sensor technology

Posted Aug. 10, 2011, at 10:02 p.m.
Print this   E-mail this    Facebook this   Tweet this     

ORONO, Maine — The U.S. Department of Energy has awarded the University of Maine a $1.2 million grant to improve tiny sensors that could help cut carbon dioxide emissions and energy costs by millions, according to the sensors’ creators.

The sensors are minuscule — about half a millimeter wide, a few millimeters long and weighing less than a gram — but could make a world of difference, said Robert Lad, a University of Maine professor of physics and president of Environetix, the Orono-based technology company that markets the sensors.

After Lad and his colleagues worked on the sensors at the university for about a decade, the technology drew interest from the U.S. Air Force, which wanted to put the sensors in jet engines to monitor their condition. Lad started Environetix in 2009 with fellow professor Mauricio Pereira da Cunha, in hopes of widely distributing the product.

The wireless, battery-free devices go into the most “hostile environments,” Lad said, such as turbine engines on aircraft where temperatures can hit 1,800 degrees Fahrenheit. A langasite crystal constantly senses temperature and pressure changes, which the sensor sends out by radio frequency to an “interrogator box” or “black box” that holds the information, Lad said.

By looking at these readings, a mechanic “can tell ahead of time if something isn’t right and can replace a part before it fails,” said Don McCann, senior project manager at Environetix.

This sort of foresight can be especially important at power plants, where a part that isn’t performing correctly can be dangerous — and very expensive to repair, according to Lad.

“You have to always know what’s going on inside these plants,” he said.

Shutting down a power plant for one day for repairs can cost as much as $1 million. Even a 1 percent drop in efficiency in coal-burning boilers at a plant can cost as much as $300 million more per year and pump out an extra 10 million metric tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, Lad said.

Keeping ahead of repairs and monitoring the efficiency of power plant facilities would be a perfect job for the sensors, Lad said, if only they could handle the heat.

The current sensors can handle temperatures around 1,800 degrees, but temperatures in power plant systems can reach 2,200 degrees, Lad said.

The $1,198,738 federal grant will help researchers find materials that can withstand the 400-degree difference.

“Another part of the grant is to figure out where our sensors are needed,” Lad said.

When their sensors can stand the heat, the university and Environetix will begin marketing them to power plants worldwide.

Sensor systems, which include about 100 sensors and and the black box, would cost a power plant $50,000 to $100,000, depending on the type of the power system, according to Lad.

Maine Energy Recovery Co., a Biddeford-based company that incinerates trash, is interested in a sensor system to monitor the condition of tubes, which can degrade over time because of heat and fumes, McCann said.

Prominent engine makers such as Pratt & Whitney and Rolls Royce have also expressed interest in the technology.

Once the sensors’ temperature tolerance improves, Lad said, power plants, steelmakers and even NASA — which might want the sensors to monitor the effect of heat and pressure on atmosphere re-entry vehicles — could be potential clients.

Similar articles:

Marketplace News

Marketplace

Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

The Bangor Daily News encourages comments about stories, but you must follow our terms of service.

In brief:

  1. Keep it civil and stay on topic
  2. No vulgarity, racial slurs, name-calling or personal attacks.
  3. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. Here are some guidelines (see more):

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_EJOGAIS4HSNBZLQLVNEOZFYVBY RonG

    a 1.2 million dollar grant to develop a new and valuable technology. when it goes commercial i wonder if the department of energy will share in the profits.

  • Anonymous

    Sensor systems, which include about 100 sensors and and the black box, would cost a power plant $50,000 to $100,000, depending on the type of the power system, according to Lad.
    So how do they know the final cost to the customer if they don’t know what materials need to be used to achieve the goal?

  • Anonymous

    A grant to UMaine that will help a private company sell a product?  Another case of corporate welfare.  If this product has that much potential then why isn’t the private sector funding this? 

    It’s these types of congressional pork that is busting the budget.  Not social security, not medicare, but corporate welfare.

  • Anonymous

    I’m just wondering if they are getting money to answer  questions they already know the answers to. Eventually it will boil down to “needs more research”. NE, I call it “academic welfare”.

  • Anonymous

    My guess is that there is a bit of additional research that needs to be done before this technology hits the hardware stores, and that DOE is placing the bet because the technology looks promising. I think it’s not been unusual that the Feds well help financially during the transition from the lab to the real world, when revenues are scarce, and banks won’t loan. Those days may soon be behind us, however, if we don’t get our fiscal house in order.

  • Anonymous

    My guess is that there is a bit of additional research that needs to be done before this technology hits the hardware stores, and that DOE is placing the bet because the technology looks promising. I think it’s not been unusual that the Feds well help financially during the transition from the lab to the real world, when revenues are scarce, and banks won’t loan. Those days may soon be behind us, however, if we don’t get our fiscal house in order.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JIDT7OUYCLX24CLCAG64CJVFXI Matt

    My god, how ignorant are these comments.  State and federal grants are how a huge amount of technologies are developed that create business opportunities that create jobs.  One of the few areas where our economy is still envied by others is our prominent research universities and the entrepreneurship and job creation spurred by them. 

    A quick, fundamental economics lesson: in a bad economy, banks and venture capitalists take less risks, slowing the technological development that has been a fundamental and important element of our economy since the industrial revolution.  Venture capital, private or public (i.e. grants), is high-risk by definition, so it is exactly when the economy slows down that we should be encouraging the government to step in to cover for lost private sector investment.  And to respond to RonG, we all “share in the profits” when the economy grows, the dollar becomes stronger, and we introduce new workers (taxpayers) into the workforce.

    Time to crawl out from you ideological rocks, stop worshipping Ayn Rand, and learn how the world really works.

  • Anonymous

    Well it’s kind of obivious that more research is needed.  That’s not the question. 

    The question is if this is such a good opportunity why doesn’t a venture capitalist fund it.  This is corporate welfare and a form of socialism.  The taxpayers pay to develop technology for a private company to profit from.  Heads they win.  Tails we lose.  Wow!

    There also appears to be a real conflict of interest.  The professor is also the president of the firm that wants to market this.  That smells.  If the technology works then it should be put to bid for any firm to buy and develop.  No free gifts.

  • Anonymous

    Well it’s kind of obivious that more research is needed.  That’s not the question. 

    The question is if this is such a good opportunity why doesn’t a venture capitalist fund it.  This is corporate welfare and a form of socialism.  The taxpayers pay to develop technology for a private company to profit from.  Heads they win.  Tails we lose.  Wow!

    There also appears to be a real conflict of interest.  The professor is also the president of the firm that wants to market this.  That smells.  If the technology works then it should be put to bid for any firm to buy and develop.  No free gifts.

  • Anonymous

    Well it’s kind of obivious that more research is needed.  That’s not the question. 

    The question is if this is such a good opportunity why doesn’t a venture capitalist fund it.  This is corporate welfare and a form of socialism.  The taxpayers pay to develop technology for a private company to profit from.  Heads they win.  Tails we lose.  Wow!

    There also appears to be a real conflict of interest.  The professor is also the president of the firm that wants to market this.  That smells.  If the technology works then it should be put to bid for any firm to buy and develop.  No free gifts.

  • Anonymous

    Not sure you (nor some others in this thread) have a clue what your talking about.  Everyone has an opinion I suppose.  However, ranting with an uninformed opinion to devalue ideas one has little to no understanding about is telling, but not at all related to the idea being devalued.  Rather such rants simply identify the ignorance for the”ranter.”  JS

  • Anonymous

    Professors are more comfortable with the grant world than the vc world. If the money is there, they’re going to try to grab it.

  • Anonymous

    Ever hear of the Wright brothers? 

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business

Marketplace Coupons

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business