Prominent economists get away — sort of — at Grand Lake Stream lodge

Posted Aug. 05, 2011, at 9:58 p.m.
Last modified Aug. 06, 2011, at 10:54 a.m.
Print this   E-mail this    Facebook this   Tweet this     

GRAND LAKE STREAM, Maine — The clear, cold and trout-filled waters of Grand Lake Stream are seemingly as far both geographically and philosophically from the bustle of Wall Street as one can get and still remain on the East Coast.

Around here, winners and losers are measured in the number and size of fish caught, not profits, and the only market to speak of is the town general store.

Even so, the 40-plus prominent economists from around the globe gathered Friday evening at Leen’s Lodge — a traditional Maine sporting camp — couldn’t help keeping one eye on the turbulent financial markets and dizzying news reports from Washington, New York and Europe.

And their opinions on the state of the global market were about as varied as their luck with the fish.

“I think things over time are going to get worse and I would not be in an index fund in the stock market right now,” said John Mauldin, author of several best-selling books and a weekly economic newsletter, “Thoughts from the Frontline,” with more than 1 million readers.

“I’m a terrified optimist because I think we have resolved a few basic things,” said David Kotok, chairman and CEO of Cumberland Advisors of Sarasota, Fla., and organizer of the annual Maine retreat for some of the most influential economic minds and voices today.

Kotok has been coming to Grand Lake Stream for more than 20 years and soon began bringing fellow economists along to this place “where we can go and hide.” This year’s annual gathering at scenic, lakefront Leen’s Lodge is the biggest yet, but no one seemed interested in hiding from the financial news.

After Thursday’s precipitous drop in the stock markets, the national talk was whether the nation was headed toward a “double-dip” recession. Friday’s stronger-than-expected figure of 117,000 new jobs in July and a slight dip in the unemployment rate seemed to buoy spirits on Wall Street a bit.

But many among the crowd gathered at Grand Lake Stream said regardless of what latest numbers say, they believe the U.S. — and the world, for that matter — still have a ways to go before the economy is humming again.

“It would be nice to offer words of comfort that everything is going to get better, but that would be false,” said Martin Barnes, chief economist at BCA Research in Montreal.

Barnes said he doesn’t believe economists should even be talking about whether we’re headed into a double-dip recession, which he argues is a rather meaningless technical term. Instead, the important question is whether the economy is going to grow.

“And at the moment, it is looking touch and go,” said Barnes.

Jim Bianco, president of Bianco Research, an investment advisory firm in Chicago, takes a slightly more pessimistic view and believes the odds of another recession are high considering the financial debt crisis in Europe and turbulence at home.

But Bianco said the situation is not nearly as dire as in the fall of 2008, when banks and financial firms were sitting on enormous debts bound to collapse. That is not the case now, he said.

So what should the Obama administration, Congress or government do to help the economy grow?

“How about nothing,” Bianco said. “Let the economy sort itself out and try not to get in the way.”

Mauldin, from his admittedly gloom-and-doom perspective, argued that the days of cheap borrowing for the U.S. and all nations have ended and now the global economy should be “embracing the deficit and embracing austerity” and accepting slow economic growth.

“And that is not fun,” Mauldin said. “But we made a number of bad choices years ago and we have to live with the consequences.”

The influence of the crowd gathered for fishing and money talk was evident by the media that filtered through Leen’s Lodge. Bloomberg News, the Wall Street Journal, National Public Radio and other national outlets all sent teams to Grand Lake Stream.

Kotok pointed out — only half-jokingly — that the Dow Jones market fell 200 points after Mauldin offered his gloomy assessment live on Bloomberg on Friday morning. It later rebounded when he and another economist shared more optimistic views.

For his part, Kotok believes the ratio between the nation’s deficit and the gross domestic product has peaked and now will decline. The anti-tax movement will provide businesses predictability and government is shrinking — all positive signs, he said.

“I think we are going through a major inflection point in the U.S,” he said while seated in the lodge’s dining hall. “Trends are changing and when that happens, there are shocks.”

Similar articles:

Marketplace News

Marketplace

Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

The Bangor Daily News encourages comments about stories, but you must follow our terms of service.

In brief:

  1. Keep it civil and stay on topic
  2. No vulgarity, racial slurs, name-calling or personal attacks.
  3. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. Here are some guidelines (see more):

  • Anonymous

    Perfect timing to ‘head for the hills’. It will be amazing to see how many hedge funds blew up over the last 2 days, especially on friday when the PPT worked their ‘magic’.
     
    Sunday night and Monday are going to be very painful for the markets. The damage will be enormous. Pension funds and 401k’s are toast….  Muni’s are next….

  • Anonymous

    From Comments at Zero Hedge

    Fri, 08/05/2011 – 22:35 | Doyle Hargraves
    Timmay Geithner, US Treasury Secretary1500 Pennsylvania Ave NWWashington DC 20220    MR. Geithner,   We are in receipt of your application for a credit line increase. After careful consideration we are unable to extend more credit to you at this time. In making a credit decsion we gather thrid party information for verification of your application information.  We made our decision based on a number of factors:03 Excessive revolving debt (current spending in excess of 140% of receipts)27 Current obligations too high in comparison to income (current debt to GDP over 100%)33 Projected obligations impossible to meet in relation to income (entitlements)42 Too many recent inquiriesThough we used a third party to gather information they did not play a role in our final credit decision. Under the FRCA you have the right to review your rating by the credit rating agencies for free. If you believe there is a mistake you can address that with the agency listed below.Standard and Poors55 Water StreetNew York ,NY10041-0001We appreciate your interest in our services and hope you will consider us for your future financing needs.SincerelyThe Communist Party of China

  • Anonymous

    doggonit had to put like on your credit denial letter below only because there was no option to click LOVE IT

  • Anonymous

    I really wonder if these people who do the credit ratings have any idea
    themselves. How many times have they downgraded a company and the
    stock tanks for a few days then comes back.? One firm gives a company
    a negtive outlook, even if the company has been doing well, and the company
    takes a hit. Even these economists can’t agree on what is going on. We even have
    economists who no matter how many times the facts and numbers show certain
    things do not work, keep pushing for more of the same. It doesn’t take rocket science
    to understand certain economic policies just don’t work no matter how many times
    you try it and how much phoney money you throw at it. Yet these are our policy makers.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Alice-Michel/100002633600044 Alice Michel

    SEC must be wondering how to put gennie back in the bottle i.e. ginnie of robot trading. this is causing trading to throw fundamentals out of the window and too much churning, which in turn causing people to attract to those 2x/3x/mixed short/long etf because it looks so good from far.       http://bit.ly/regNre

  • Anonymous

     Kevin Miller should have asked them why his liberal chief is killing us. The well is dry…..

  • Anonymous

    Would you be interested in buying any shocks and bonds? LOL… 

  • Anonymous

    No doubt these priests of high economics are discovering interesting portents as they scan the entrails of sacrificed chickens. What next for Maine, a convention of the world’s leading alchemists as they share information in the search for the Philosopher’s Stone?

  • Anonymous

    Yeah, like tax cuts for the rich – excuse me, job makers – that Mr. Bush put in place ten years ago and Mr. Republican Obama has continued?  They sure have worked dandy!  I love the fact that these rich economists can afford to go hang out at a wonderful fishing camp in Maine when the Maine around them is crumbling.

  • Anonymous

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.  Best comment I’ve read in a long time.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Cecil-Gray/1027119962 Cecil Gray

    Only Congress can turn the tax cuts back not Obama. 

  • Anonymous

    I’m wondering about the 400 trillion or so in derivatives out there. This could be really nasty.

  • Anonymous

    Mr. Obama caved to a small minority in Congress because he didn’t want to raise taxes on the middle class. He could be a leader and say “no way is this happening again” and let those damn cuts expire. But he caves and caves and caves. Bush and Obama. As far as I’m concerned they are the same. Please don’t preach to me about Congress.

  • Anonymous

    Trust me on this, the super committee will be seriously looking at a VAT and Carbon tax.

  • G. Alan Woods

    If First Wind gets their way (don’t they always?) no one will be able to “get away” at Grand Lake Stream. They are going to erect 27 428′ tall turbines at the head of the Downeast Lakes and are already planning “Rollins South” which will destroy the value of Nicatous Lake.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_VPMAB533A643RYHIJZADPTCWYQ BOSTON BEANS

    Give everyone who WORKS and PAYS taxes(none for the sycophants on Welfare etc)…a $50000 deposit at the bank…then have em bring in their credit cards and have the monies deducted…effectively recharges the consumer/reduces debt, and ADDS $ to banks (they lose that interest income though-TOUGH!)…next, bring in the cash for clunkers car/all car loans and have that paid off…again, freeing the consumer from debt and putting cash in the banks coffers…do the same for student loans, mortgages etc until the 50k is gone…

    Oh, and if you have no debt, must put into the retirement account…or, if past that stage…take out 10k per year and spend it …lots of cash at the banks, no one with killer credit card interest rates and consumers have their balance sheets cleaned up…

    Those folks not paying taxes, sorry, you have been eating too long for free…

  • Anonymous

    Huh.  Never caught much trout in Grand Lake Stream.  Salmon, sure.  But “trout filled”??

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SCNJPPZDX7GEYELESV2YGQFLN4 Pat T. Riot

    I think it was Harry Truman who said something like, “If you laid all the economists in the world end-to-end, they would still point in different directions.”

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SCNJPPZDX7GEYELESV2YGQFLN4 Pat T. Riot

    I think it was Harry Truman who said something like, “If you laid all the economists in the world end-to-end, they would still point in different directions.”

  • Anonymous

    Stimulus would have worked better if they just gave a million bucks to each american

  • Anonymous

    It Just Went From Bad To Far, Far Worse As Germany Says Italy Is Too Big For EFSF To Save, Refuses To Carry Euro Bailout Burden

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/it-just-went-bad-far-far-worse-germany-says-italy-too-big-efsf-save-refuses-carry-euro-bailout-#comments

  • Anonymous

    But that would be “redistribution of wealth” and those that were bailed out and bonused would have suffered tremendously. 

  • Anonymous

    But that would be “redistribution of wealth” and those that were bailed out and bonused would have suffered tremendously. 

  • Anonymous

    But that would be “redistribution of wealth” and those that were bailed out and bonused would have suffered tremendously. 

  • Anonymous

    No offense doggonit,but the word nasty could be an understatment (fatal) is probably more realistic.

  • Anonymous

    I agree….

  • Anonymous

    its all bullcrap.
    Smoke and mirrors.
    Voodoo – Doodoo.

    Best comment :

    “Obama get out of the way”. (paraphrase)

    What was on the menu ?

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business

Marketplace Coupons

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business