Warren restricts methadone clinics

Posted Aug. 02, 2011, at 8:58 p.m.
Print this   E-mail this    Facebook this   Tweet this  

WARREN, Maine — It took minutes for the town’s voters to agree to pass a new land use ordinance designed to keep methadone clinics away from schools, churches, day care facilities, parks, playgrounds and homes.

In fact, the clinics now are allowed only on two roads in town, Route 1 and Route 90.

About 60 voters nearly unanimously approved the ordinance on Tuesday night.

The meeting adjourned not quite 20 minutes after the town clerk passed out the ballots.

The ordinance was written after a national methadone treatment provider stated it planned to come to town and rent a former school. The town enacted a moratorium against methadone clinics until it could write this ordinance.

Because of the moratorium, CRC Health Group and the man who tried to buy the former school both are suing the town. The methadone treatment provider and Bob Emery say that the town acted against the Americans With Disabilities Act by temporarily disallowing clinics to operate in the town.

The next court mediation is scheduled for later this month, according to the town attorney.

In the very back of the Masonic Hall, where the public vote was held, sat Emery’s attorney, Phillip Cohen. Cohen said the new ordinance also is discriminatory against people with disabilities.

“It doesn’t resolve the issue,” he said Tuesday night.

The town’s attorney, Patrick Mellor, disagreed. He said the ordinance is fair and doesn’t mention methadone clinics specifically. It’s a “large business, professional and medical offices or clinics” ordinance.

“It’s a very typical ordinance,” Mellor said. “They have all of Route 1 and all of Route 90. It’s the logical place for it to be. It’s very reasonable.”

The new ordinance limits any office that has more than 150 visits daily to Route 90 or Route 1. Large offices must be 500 feet from homes, schools, churches, day care providers, libraries, parks or playgrounds. They can operate only from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. weekdays and 7 a.m. to noon weekends and holidays. They also must pave driveways and have a specific amount of parking.

In 2005, the city of Rockland tried to limit a methadone clinic to a certain road and it also faced an ADA lawsuit. The city eventually let the methadone clinic move to a spot on Route 1, which was against the city’s own ordinance. That methadone clinic, Turning Tide, was shut down by state and federal officials in August 2010 after the owner was charged with felony cocaine possession.

At the brief Tuesday night meeting, residents also voted to raise $30,000 for extra attorney fees this year.

According to Town Manager Grant Watmough, the town already has overdrawn the $16,000 attorney fee budget line by more than $2,000 — and the fiscal year is only half over. All the voters save one decided it was a good idea to raise the extra cash.

Similar articles:

BDN Marketplace News

Marketplace Businesses

Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

The Bangor Daily News encourages comments about stories, but you must follow our terms of service.

In brief:

  1. Keep it civil and stay on topic
  2. No vulgarity, racial slurs, name-calling or personal attacks.
  3. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. Here are some guidelines (see more):

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1126588336 Dawn LaFlamme

    You just HAD to put methadone in the headline. So classy. Villagesoup didn’t seem to feel the need. http://knox.villagesoup.com/news/story/warren-approves-medical-clinic-rules-money-for-legal-fees/429467?cid=489652

  • http://www.facebook.com/kerry.f.wolf Kerry Fields Wolf

    Isn’t it interesting that many of the facilities the clinics have to be so far away from–i.e., libraries, playgrounds, schools, and even churches on sundays, often have in excess of 150 “visitors” a day, yet they are not restricted to these two streets. It’s quite obvious this is in no way about traffic issues and is in every way about discrimination and imaginary fears of ill-informed people and lawmakers. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/kerry.f.wolf Kerry Fields Wolf

    Isn’t it interesting that many of the facilities the clinics have to be so far away from–i.e., libraries, playgrounds, schools, and even churches on sundays, often have in excess of 150 “visitors” a day, yet they are not restricted to these two streets. It’s quite obvious this is in no way about traffic issues and is in every way about discrimination and imaginary fears of ill-informed people and lawmakers. 

  • Anonymous

    Regardless of whether or not the ordinance mentions methadone clinics or also includes other larger businesses (which is clearly done to avoid any claims of discrimination) it’s obvious that it was made specifically to keep methadone clinics out and because of that it’s still illegal – a violation of the ADA. Warren is going to lose this fight, spending a lot of money in the process just to keep out a clinic because of inaccurate fears of what impact the clinic would have.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DSRNSNIOD3IVI5KF52JCSAZGFM Dawn

    It is clear that you are not familiar with Warren at all. There are NO businesses in Warren with that level of commerce or traffic that are not on Route 1 or Route 90. The only place that has that is even close is the elementary school, which is within sight of Route 90. It would be so nice if you didn’t judge the townspeople when you are clearly not aware of our unique situation.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DSRNSNIOD3IVI5KF52JCSAZGFM Dawn

    It is clear that you are not familiar with Warren at all. There are NO businesses in Warren with that level of commerce or traffic that are not on Route 1 or Route 90. The only place that has that is even close is the elementary school, which is within sight of Route 90. It would be so nice if you didn’t judge the townspeople when you are clearly not aware of our unique situation.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DSRNSNIOD3IVI5KF52JCSAZGFM Dawn

    It is clear that you are not familiar with Warren at all. There are NO businesses in Warren with that level of commerce or traffic that are not on Route 1 or Route 90. The only place that has that is even close is the elementary school, which is within sight of Route 90. It would be so nice if you didn’t judge the townspeople when you are clearly not aware of our unique situation.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DSRNSNIOD3IVI5KF52JCSAZGFM Dawn

    It is clear that you are not familiar with Warren at all. There are NO businesses in Warren with that level of commerce or traffic that are not on Route 1 or Route 90. The only place that has that is even close is the elementary school, which is within sight of Route 90. It would be so nice if you didn’t judge the townspeople when you are clearly not aware of our unique situation.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Kelly-Green/100002233661222 Kelly Green

    I would really like to know why an addict that ruined his/her own health by using illegal drugs is covered by the ADA.  Being protected in such a manner for making unintelligible life choices runs counter of anything remotely affiliated with common sense.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Kelly-Green/100002233661222 Kelly Green

    Maybe because it’s a methadone clinic?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DSRNSNIOD3IVI5KF52JCSAZGFM Dawn

    Actually it’s a former school. 

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DSRNSNIOD3IVI5KF52JCSAZGFM Dawn

    Actually it’s a former school. 

  • Anonymous

    It’s to prevent people who are in recovery and have turned their lives around, or are in the process of doing so, from being discriminated against because they used to be addicts which is recognized to be a disease/brain disorder by the medical establishment and other experts. It would be very unfair if Rush Limbaugh was discriminated against just because he used to use opiates and is a recovering addict, don’t you think? (BTW, Mr. Limbaugh used an opiate drug, similar to methadone, to help him start recovering from his addiction.)

  • Anonymous

    It’s to prevent people who are in recovery and have turned their lives around, or are in the process of doing so, from being discriminated against because they used to be addicts which is recognized to be a disease/brain disorder by the medical establishment and other experts. It would be very unfair if Rush Limbaugh was discriminated against just because he used to use opiates and is a recovering addict, don’t you think? (BTW, Mr. Limbaugh used an opiate drug, similar to methadone, to help him start recovering from his addiction.)

  • Anonymous

    It’s to prevent people who are in recovery and have turned their lives around, or are in the process of doing so, from being discriminated against because they used to be addicts which is recognized to be a disease/brain disorder by the medical establishment and other experts. It would be very unfair if Rush Limbaugh was discriminated against just because he used to use opiates and is a recovering addict, don’t you think? (BTW, Mr. Limbaugh used an opiate drug, similar to methadone, to help him start recovering from his addiction.)

  • Anonymous

    It’s to prevent people who are in recovery and have turned their lives around, or are in the process of doing so, from being discriminated against because they used to be addicts which is recognized to be a disease/brain disorder by the medical establishment and other experts. It would be very unfair if Rush Limbaugh was discriminated against just because he used to use opiates and is a recovering addict, don’t you think? (BTW, Mr. Limbaugh used an opiate drug, similar to methadone, to help him start recovering from his addiction.)

  • Anonymous

    It’s to prevent people who are in recovery and have turned their lives around, or are in the process of doing so, from being discriminated against because they used to be addicts which is recognized to be a disease/brain disorder by the medical establishment and other experts. It would be very unfair if Rush Limbaugh was discriminated against just because he used to use opiates and is a recovering addict, don’t you think? (BTW, Mr. Limbaugh used an opiate drug, similar to methadone, to help him start recovering from his addiction.)

  • Anonymous

    It’s to prevent people who are in recovery and have turned their lives around, or are in the process of doing so, from being discriminated against because they used to be addicts which is recognized to be a disease/brain disorder by the medical establishment and other experts. It would be very unfair if Rush Limbaugh was discriminated against just because he used to use opiates and is a recovering addict, don’t you think? (BTW, Mr. Limbaugh used an opiate drug, similar to methadone, to help him start recovering from his addiction.)

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business

BDN Marketplace Coupons

ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business
ADVERTISEMENT | Grow your business