March 17, 2018
Opinion Latest News | Poll Questions | School Walkouts | Down East Prison | LL Bean

No to T-Mobile, AT&T merger


You have seen the ad. The T-Mobile woman is young, and wearing a red-and-white striped dress that recalls summer and the American flag. The iPhone man is also young, but he is swathed in dark clothes, and he has a bald middle-aged man riding on his back.

“Who’s your friend?” the woman asks.

“It’s the old AT&T network,” the young man replies.

“That’ll slow you down,” she says.

The consumer choice that ad represents will go away if AT&T’s purchase of T-Mobile is approved by the Federal Communications Commission. We think the deal should not be approved, for several reasons.

One is customer service. As the ad implies, AT&T is not known for its good service. Paul Reynolds of Consumers Union reports that their surveys “found AT&T to be the clear worst wireless carrier in the country.” AT&T is rolling out new technology, so its service will probably improve, but still this is a case of the acquiring company being the one with the most problems.

Another reason is price. Wall Street sees the gobbling up of T-Mobile “as the elimination of a pesky low-priced rival,” says Eric Savitz of Forbes. Customers need to have companies like that.

Both of these reasons are part of a larger concern about market power. This transaction combines the No. 2 and No. 4 in the market, creating a new No. 1. That leaves Sprint Nextel at a weak No. 3.

The obvious next step is the combination of Verizon and Sprint. At that point, the mobile-phone providers becomes a Pepsi-and-Coke market with two big choices.

For those reasons, our thought on this merger is “no.”

The Seattle Times  (March 22)

Have feedback? Want to know more? Send us ideas for follow-up stories.

You may also like